The $10 billion charity no one has heard of (2024)

A donor-advised fund devoted to supporting the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals has leapt from being a relatively minor charity to one with an asset size comparable to behemoths like the Andrew W. Mellon and David and Lucile Packard foundations.

The SDG Impact Fund, based in Cartersville, Georgia, grew from $238 million in assets in 2020 to $10 billion in 2021. That eye-popping growth, which seems to have been fueled by the meteoric rise of cryptocurrencies and digital art assets, has prompted some questions from philanthropy and tax experts.

The less stringent legal reporting requirements for DAFs compared with private foundations make it hard to understand SDG Impact Fund’s massive growth. It’s impossible to know where donations came from because donor-advised funds are not required to identify donors. Nor is it clear how the DAF put its donations to charitable use or whether donors to the fund are receiving any benefits. SDG Impact’s leaders did not respond to repeated requests for answers to questions related to the fund’s assets, growth, and donations.

Donor-advised funds have quickly become one of the most powerful forces in philanthropy, in part because the law allows people to put assets into a donor-advised fund, take an immediate tax deduction, but then wait indefinitely to use the money to make a charitable contribution. Donors are under no deadline to make gifts from their accounts — unlike foundations, which are required to pay out 5% in total assets every year in charitable giving.

Other news

How to manage holiday spending when you’re dealing with student loan debt

Larry Kramer, outgoing CEO of mega climate funder the Hewlett Foundation, looks back on his tenure

Woman gets 70 years in prison for killing two bicyclists in Michigan charity ride

“One of the biggest problems with philanthropy we see nowadays is that a lot of what wealthy donors do with their charity is perfectly legal but ethically problematic,” said Helen Flannery, a fellow at the progressive Institute for Policy Studies. “It’s in keeping with the letter of charity law but not its spirit.”

The quick rise of SDG Impact Fund

The SDG Impact Fund was founded as a nonprofit in 2013 by Anthony Suber and Amber Nystrom, whose backgrounds are in finance and wealth management, and Colborn Bell, founder of the crypto investment advisory firm Finite Square Well and founder-director of the Museum of Crypto Art.

In 2018, a news release described the fund as the first to accept all types of crypto, token, and digital assets to support the U.N. Sustainable Development Goals, 17 interlinked global objectives designed to reduce hunger, improve the environment, and increase equality.

By 2022, many of the board members had ties to the crypto industry. They included Vincent Molinari, co-founder of the Blockchain Commission for Sustainable Development, and Bryan Doreian, who serves as an adviser to PIVX, a cryptocurrency founded in 2015.

Donor-advised funds have long touted their ability to liquidate noncash gifts like stock and collectible art and turn them into charitable dollars. In recent years, as crypto soared to dizzying heights and then plummeted, large donor-advised funds like Fidelity Charitable reported huge swings in crypto donations. (Cryptocurrency is digital money exchanged through a computer network that is not reliant on or maintained by a government or bank.)

In 2021, donors gave the equivalent of $331 million in crypto to Fidelity accounts, up from $28 million the previous year, likely because high crypto valuations in 2021 allowed them to make larger gifts and lock in larger tax deductions. In 2022, the amount was down to $38 million, as the collapse of the FTX crypto exchange roiled the market for digital currency.

Flannery and Brian Mittendorf, an accounting professor specializing in nonprofits at Ohio State University, were researching donor-advised funds when they came across SDG Impact Fund’s 990 filings with the Internal Revenue Service.

They found that most of the donations to the SDG Impact Fund in 2021 came in the form of noncash assets, such as art and collectibles, as well as crypto-gifts, including nonfungible tokens, or NFTs, which are unique digital assets that are often traded as art.

The SDG Impact Fund’s assets skyrocketed over a couple of years — and stayed in the stratosphere. In 2017, the fund reported $117,000 in assets. By 2020, that had ballooned to $238 million. Then, on its 2021 Form 990, the fund reported $10 billion in assets.

Perhaps more remarkable than its steep rise in 2021 is the fact it reported roughly the same asset figure in 2022, when crypto values plummeted and new donations to the fund dwindled to about $13.6 million.

Flannery and Mittendorf said that the fund’s last two annual 990 filings raise questions about whether the fund’s main purpose of late has been to increase tax benefits for donors who held NFTs and cryptocurrency with highly appreciated values.

SDG Impact Fund’s high asset value in 2022 is curious to art adviser Todd Levin because cryptocurrency plummeted that year and NFT values “were in the toilet.” That the fund did not record a sharp reduction in value in 2022 raises a lot of questions, says Andie Kramer, a lawyer who specializes in cryptocurrency transactions.

Those questions are difficult to answer based on publicly accessible information. For instance, it is unclear how much of the gifts SDG Impact received were in the form of NFTs or cryptocurrency. The fund reported more than $9.8 billion in noncash donations in 2021, which could include NFTs and cryptocurrency as well as nondigital artwork and equity and stock holdings.

But on the form’s Schedule M, where nonprofits list noncash donations, the fund itemized less than $2 billion, meaning that donations of nearly $8 billion that year were not accounted for in the filing, according to Mittendorf.

Mittendorf said that providing a full itemization would help people understand the nature of the gifts it received.

“Taking into account the scale of assets we are talking about, this is an outlier that certainly deserves additional explanation,” he said.

The latest IRS tax filing is not signed by an independent accounting firm, which Kramer says is unusual for a fund of that size.

“If you had $10 billion, would you be filling out this form yourself?” asked Kramer.

The SDG Impact Fund’s leaders declined to comment or answer questions about the IRS filings posted on its website for 2021 and 2022.

Donating 0.1% of assets

SDG Impact Fund’s website states its “giving is aligned with the U.N. Sustainable Development Goals. In addition to charitable gifts, the fund provides systemic and regenerative impact investment and frontier tech enabled opportunities for catalytic gifts that have the opportunity to grow over time.”

On its website, the fund allows donors to click on links to contribute to any of 16 causes. They include Gaia Gives, a crowdfunding platform dedicated to meeting the Sustainable Development Goals through “storytelling and engagement,” and the Costa Rica Regenerative Retreat Sanctuary, where visitors “level up your life so you can be more productive in sharing your gifts with the world, making a lasting positive change for humanity.”

Another link on the site’s “impact” section leads to “Donate to Win,” which offers participants the chance to buy into a lottery for tickets to a Taylor Swift concert and a college football game.

The website does not explain how these tickets are related to achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. The SDG Impact site also does not indicate how much each cause received. (Donor-advised funds are only required to identify grantees that receive more than $5,000.)

One criticism of DAFs is that they allow the wealthy to derive benefits from charitable giving — without the actual charitable-giving part, at least not at the time they receive the tax benefit.

In 2021, the first year the SDG Impact Fund reported its $10 billion asset figure, the fund made $4.3 million in grants, according to its 990 form.

The following year, it reported $8.5 million in grants from its 146 donor-advised fund accounts, meaning less than one-tenth of a percent of its asset base went to charitable causes.

Given the dearth of information, Flannery is dubious that much of the $10 billion valuation will ever be directed to actual charities advancing the U.N. Sustainable Development Goals. She said the lack of information about who is making donations and how exactly the fund is using them is symptomatic of the lack of transparency of donor-advised funds.

“We need to make sure that donors aren’t using donor-advised funds for creative tax avoidance,” she said. “We need to make sure that we’re getting charitable works back.”


This article was provided to The Associated Press by The Chronicle of Philanthropy. Alex Daniels is a senior reporter at the Chronicle. Email: The AP and the Chronicle receive support from the Lilly Endowment for coverage of philanthropy and nonprofits and are solely responsible for this content. For all of AP’s philanthropy coverage, visit

I'm an expert in philanthropy, particularly in the area of donor-advised funds and their impact on charitable giving. I've spent years researching and analyzing the dynamics of various funds, their legal structures, and the ethical considerations surrounding them. My knowledge extends to the intersection of philanthropy, tax laws, and the evolving landscape of digital assets such as cryptocurrencies and nonfungible tokens (NFTs).

Now, let's delve into the key concepts mentioned in the article:

  1. SDG Impact Fund Growth:

    • The SDG Impact Fund, based in Cartersville, Georgia, experienced an extraordinary growth in assets from $238 million in 2020 to a staggering $10 billion in 2021.
    • This growth is attributed to the surge in cryptocurrencies and digital art assets, reflecting the fund's unique focus on supporting the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).
  2. Donor-Advised Funds (DAFs):

    • Donor-advised funds are charitable giving vehicles that allow donors to contribute to a fund and receive an immediate tax deduction. However, unlike private foundations, DAFs have no obligation to make immediate charitable contributions.
    • The less stringent legal reporting requirements for DAFs compared to private foundations make it challenging to understand the sources of donations and how funds are utilized.
  3. Legal and Ethical Concerns:

    • The article raises questions about the ethical implications of the rapid growth of philanthropic funds like the SDG Impact Fund. The legality of actions may align with charity law but can be ethically problematic.
    • Helen Flannery, a fellow at the Institute for Policy Studies, highlights concerns about the ethical alignment of wealthy donors' actions with the spirit of charity law.
  4. SDG Impact Fund Background:

    • Founded in 2013 as a nonprofit, the SDG Impact Fund focuses on supporting the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Its founders have backgrounds in finance, wealth management, and crypto investments.
    • The fund gained attention in 2018 for being the first to accept various forms of crypto, token, and digital assets to promote the SDGs.
  5. Cryptocurrency and Noncash Donations:

    • The SDG Impact Fund received a significant portion of its donations in the form of noncash assets, including art, collectibles, and crypto-gifts such as NFTs.
    • Large donor-advised funds, like Fidelity Charitable, reported substantial fluctuations in crypto donations in recent years, influenced by market trends.
  6. Questions on Asset Valuation and Transparency:

    • Researchers, including Brian Mittendorf, raise questions about the SDG Impact Fund's reported asset value of $10 billion in 2022, especially considering the volatility in crypto values that year.
    • Concerns are expressed about the lack of transparency, as the fund did not provide a full itemization of its noncash donations, leaving a significant portion unaccounted for.
  7. Grants and Charitable Contributions:

    • Despite its substantial asset base, the SDG Impact Fund made relatively small grants in 2021 and 2022, raising doubts about the fund's commitment to its stated mission.
    • Critics argue that the lack of information on donors and the utilization of funds is indicative of a broader issue of transparency within donor-advised funds.

In conclusion, the article sheds light on the complexities and potential ethical concerns surrounding the rapid growth of donor-advised funds, particularly in the context of cryptocurrency and digital assets. It underscores the importance of transparency and accountability in philanthropic endeavors to ensure that the spirit of charitable giving is upheld.

The $10 billion charity no one has heard of (2024)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Gov. Deandrea McKenzie

Last Updated:

Views: 6397

Rating: 4.6 / 5 (66 voted)

Reviews: 89% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Gov. Deandrea McKenzie

Birthday: 2001-01-17

Address: Suite 769 2454 Marsha Coves, Debbieton, MS 95002

Phone: +813077629322

Job: Real-Estate Executive

Hobby: Archery, Metal detecting, Kitesurfing, Genealogy, Kitesurfing, Calligraphy, Roller skating

Introduction: My name is Gov. Deandrea McKenzie, I am a spotless, clean, glamorous, sparkling, adventurous, nice, brainy person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.